Therefore, if you buy 1 share of GBTC at 388, you are paying ~$41 for ~$23 worth of Bitcoin. Thats an absolutely absurd >150% premium. Not to mention the 2% annual fee GBTC charges.
This premium is not the GBTC’s fault. Its investors that need their heads checked. GBTC cannot reweight their Bitcoin holdings in anywhere near real time. The Winklevoss ETF, should it make it through the SEC, would reweight much more often giving investors a vehicle which more closely tracks the actual price of Bitcoin.
August 1st is when the fun begins in Bitcoin. “BIP148” (aka “User Activated Soft Fork” dubbed UASF) is activated and the world finds out whether Bitcoin stays together or splits in two. If this is unfamiliar to you, then read here, or here or just give “SegWit” a googling. Avoid trying to research this on twitter, because you will find little outside of ad-hominem attacks between groups who cant agree on the best way to scale bitcoin. While I only have a peripheral understanding of the arguments what I do understand is that there is a real possibility of any of the following:
The majority gets together and Bitcoin moves forward intact
Bitcoin splits in two
Bitcoin splits in two…hundred.
Why is there so much Bitcoin infighting?
I think it boils down to how much money is involved now. Bitcoin mining generates roughly $4million/day (1,700 bitcoins mined per day * $2,500/bitcoin). Thats big money. Money is a leading cause of divorce, and it appears thats whats ahead for Bitcoin.
Certainly Bitcoin splitting would hurt the price, at least initially. Regardless of outcome party lines are so split that it’s hard to envision smooth sailing over the next few months. Who knows which version of Bitcoin to bet on? The general public is just warming up to Bitcoin and crypto – and know there will be several versions? Picture logging into your Coinbase account, ready to buy bitcoin for the first time. Surprise! There are now two versions. Which do you chose?
To me, this paints an ugly short term picture. I think this could hurt or at least keep a lid on Bitcoin prices for the short term.
How to you Hedge the Bitcoin Fork?
Keep holding you Bitcoin and come back in 6 months. Its quite possible the fork produces two (or more!) versions of Bitcoin which both attract investment and you will have equally or more crypto value in a few months. Or, one of the two versions rockets ahead in price. No one knows whats on the other side of this forking.
Move to cash. Bitcoins had a nice run…let the dust settle then figure out where to allocate your funds. (Side note, I’ve heard Tether can help here but have not investigated).
Other Crypto: More below:
There are some very viable alternatives to Bitcoin, that are more or less copies of Bitcoins code. Many don’t realize that you can simply copy bitcoins current code, paste it into a distinct infrastructure and, voila, you have your own cryptocurrency. While this is indeed a massive oversimplification, the point is while two groups are hell bent on controlling the future of bitcoin, others are taking what they love about Bitcoin, making a few tweaks, and providing a cohesive alternative. Cohesive meaning the people with skin in the game aren’t at each others throats.
I chose the two below because they already have a fairly substantial market cap and existing mining hardware for bitcoin could flip to mine these other currencies. Bitcoin mining hardware isn’t “fungible” to all cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin mining hardware cant mine Ethereum for example.
This detail about mining is important. If you run a large mining operation you can’t simple close up shop because you think Bitcoins future is destroyed. There are bills to pay. You can however move to an alternative currency and I suspect most of these guys have fork contingency plans in place. Note that you could write dissertations on each currency. So, do some homework before investing.
My best bets to pickup Bitcoin market share?
Dash – Has a voting system in place (which resolves issues like forking quickly) and a unique structure to help fund future development.
Litecoin – Widely available its probably more accessible to new investors (at the time of this writing). Coinbase for example has Litecoin, but not dash. Litecoin’s sales pitch is essentially that its network is lighter and faster that Bitcoin.
It’s very hard to say what the best play is – what makes this so murky is the political split between Bitcoin factions. To me this is what makes investing in other currencies such an attractive idea.
After the Bitcoin Fork
Six months from now the dust should be settling and the crypto landscape will definitely look different. Its hard to remember that just a few years ago none of this existed and now its a multi billion dollar industry. Remember, regardless of what happens with the Bitcoin fork there are incredible developments ahead. 10 years from know this will all be just a blip on the radar – maybe that means there is no wrong way to play it.
Hedge funds and Wall Street firms have been slow moving into trading and investing in cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. There are some
indicators that sentiment is shifting such as JP Morgan (and others) joining the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance and Goldman Sachs initiating research coverage of Bitcoin.
Assume for a second that sentiment is suddenly 100% positive and that all the “scam” and “crime” stigma has left the building. So, whats the problem?
Regulation of Bitcoin, Ethereum
Party of the beauty and attraction of crypto is the decentralization and lack of regulation. There are many reasons why this is beneficial. But if you’re a big bank or managing billions of dollars, regulation matters. First, Bitcoin is not “legal” in all countries. Just look at what China did a few months ago when they started “regulating” Bitcoin. As per wikipedia: “While private parties can hold and trade bitcoins in China, regulation prohibits financial firms like banks from doing the same.” Not only is there (outside) risk of the US doing this, but if you’re a fund thats has Chinese investors or does business with China this clouds the water.
Most assets are also considered collateral. If I have $10 million in gold I can bet that the bank I deal with would consider that an asset against which I can borrow. Does every bank see Bitcoin in that same light?
A lower risk, but still foreseeable is the risks of regulators such as the SEC or FINRA coming after you for engaging in (for example) an investment used to launder money. Maybe you buy Monero and build up a large position and
those assets are seized because the FBI thinks they were used in some hacking blackmail scheme. Probable? Probably not. Possible? Sure.
The facts are that until a regulator “green lights” Bitcoin and/or Ethereum its going to be tough for large institutions to trade or invest.
When Might Regulators Weigh In?
I’ve been watching the SEC’s ruling on the Winklevoss Bitcoin ETF launch. Its taken years for a ruling, and earlier this year it was initially rejected. However in April the SEC decided to take another look. I think its a bit underestimated the impact that approval would have to the price of Bitcoin. This would give not only a regulatory stamp of approval, but paves the way towards clearing and settlement of Bitcoin at an institutional level.
Clearing and Settlement is a Major Problem
Take stock or ETF trading as an example. When funds (or anyone as a generalization) trade publicly listed stock that stock clears through a central clearing house called the DTC. If I am a hedge fund and have my assets at say, Goldman Sachs (your “prime broker”), I can trade stock with JP Morgan. JPM sends the stock to my account at Goldman through the DTC. Its a pretty seamless process and universal to US stock trading.
Now, lets say I’m a hedge fund and I want to buy $1 million Bitcoin. Buying is easy enough – you go to one of the exchanges, wire money and buy your Bitcoin. The problem is there is no way to get your Bitcoin back to your prime broker. No, a wallet even with vaulted cold storage wouldn’t work. The risks associated with that are high, but the mechanics of trading in and out are a huge hindrance. If the fund needs to immediately raise assets by selling Bitcoin they need to have immediate access to those coins. While yes, you can work out the mechanics if you are a small fund or “crypto” is your dedicated business. But for large institutions who want to simply invest in crypto this is a major hindrance.
How Could Clearing Change?
One possible way is for clearing houses/prime brokers like Goldman or Morgan Stanley to have some type of central clearing wallet. Linked to that wallet would be “sub-wallets” for each fund that owns Bitcoin. Therefore if I go to Gemini Exchange and buy 1000 Bitcoin, I tell Gemini to send that Bitcoin to Morgan Stanley on my behalf. Morgan Stanley then has custody and can allocate the Bitcoin to my funds sub-wallet. This “sub-wallet” concept seems to peripherally exist and I’d imagine banks could pay someone to hash it out rather quickly.
If the Bitcoin ETF launched this would circumvent all of this, because you could just buy the ETF and it would clear via the DTC like all other stocks and ETFs. (Yes, I am aware the GBTC exists, but the premium on that product is absurd). To this point I think this clearing/custodial aspect is probably one of the problems the SEC is having with the product.
In the End
I’m confident these issues will be worked out. The fact that they haven’t yet makes (in my opinion) Bitcoin and Ethereum such an interesting investment at the moment. The door is currently cracked open to big investors, but eventually we could see a real flood of assets.